Wikipedia talk:In the news

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

ITNR archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25

Should we change the pictures daily?

I think so. The other main page sections do. This might include Photo RDs. If not, it may require reposting the same picture after a few days, or a different picture from the same article. It may even give us an incentive to post more articles in a timely fashion. However it happens, we seem to keep getting stuck on the last posted ones for rather long times lately. Is that what we want? InedibleHulk (talk) 22:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the image daily sounds like a great idea to me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am still trying to evaluate if there is a template/bot supporting option to establish a type of image carousel for this type of thing to make thing mostly automatic.

Changing the image is very admin heavy (verify image protection, make sure image is appropriate, change the "pictured" part of the blurb, etc) that we should try to avoid this too much. But I agree when an image is up for at least 48hr whether dye to lack of new blurbs, or blurbs without images, then exploring a new replacement image is reasonable as long as we aren't fighting for what image gets it. Masem (t) 22:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the last three hours or so, I've been trying to get the big red one from Xander Schauffele through to ERRORs. If it's OK with you, we could start working together on moving that forward. If not, totally understandable, no worries! InedibleHulk (talk) 23:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at that one, and put it in the queue a couple of days ago, but it's very poor quality and has visible artefacts in the thumbnail. Step hen 23:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid. So OK, forget it, it sounds like there is a queue. Go with another? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Go with another?" What one exactly? Step hen 23:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any queue. I thought you could. Maybe even one where buddy doesn't look happy with the bad news? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By "in the queue", I believe Stephen meant this edit to WP:CMP. —Cryptic 23:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. I was clumsily pointing out that I'd already considered that picture, but ruled it out on quality grounds. Step hen 23:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn Phú Trọng's was up for a while, but it's now been a while ago, so there's that. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are for the topmost item if an image is available for that item. Step hen 23:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You no-sold my vote at the April Cantelo nom, but yeah, April Cantelo. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But that's an RD and there's no consensus to have pictures for RDs, however many times you suggest it. Step hen 23:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just a me thing anymore. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, I am serious. There's just a bug going around that makes links like these look small (to me, at least). That's not urgent, but later, maybe. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toumani Diabaté's is pretty cool, too. Could remind more people that koras exist. We all already know there's a chorus. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get that discussion above properly closed with consensus in your favour and we can start picturing RDs. Then all the hand wringers can be pointed at this new consensus. Step hen 00:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it my best and my best is sometimes just enough; however it goes, it was good working with you again! InedibleHulk (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other queue is the commons' category related to checking the licenses of such files. that queue appears to be at least x0,000-some deep. I don't know what they are doing over there for that purpose, but that's not an en.wiki aspect. Masem (t) 00:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Good idea to ensure / showcase the freshness of the homepage. Would also support cycling through the blurb AND RDs for images. No need for any change in ITNC processes. Re: the implementation, would be good to have a protected queue of images and hopefully a bot comes by and rotates the images. Ktin (talk) 16:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the purpose of image changing on the main page is meant to correlate with changes in the section. If we want ITN to be more fresh, than we should focus on getting more stories on the front page. — Knightoftheswords 14:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 days and counting is the amount of time that the latest picture has been stuck at ITN. This is not quality; it's embarrassingly stale. It's trivially easy to fix this problem when we have so many good RD photos currently going unused. See examples (pictured). Andrew🐉(talk) 12:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is clear consensus does not agree with you. _{Duly signed,} ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 20:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was easier to use one of the many available for the Paralympics, the topmost blurb. —Bagumba (talk) 03:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Tour de France Femmes to ITNR

As noted at ITN/C, every edition of the Tour de France Femmes has appeared at ITN since the race began in 2022, so I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be an entry at WP:ITNR.

Support as proposer. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I assumed it was INTR already. Kcmastrpc (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support demonstrated news coverage and wp article quality for three years running. Also good to balance with the men's Tour de France. Masem (t) 15:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, also assumed it was ITNR already. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kcmastrpc. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as original commenter at ITNC. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 21:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ITNR is for articles that repeatedly demonstrate they meet ITNQUALITY and have been posted multiple times previously. The TdFF meets these criteria, having been posted all 3 years so far. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added to ITNR per the clear consensus above. Gödel2200 (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Kasia Niewiadoma still up on In the news?

I don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but why is Kasia Niewiadoma still up on ITN? Her win has been up on ITN since August 20th. It's been 10 days. I don't think it's difficult to remove her, even if that means the ITN section for today (and until we find a replacement) is shorter than normal. Alexysun (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the only documented reason to remove a blurb is becuase there is not enough space due to WP:ITNBALANCE. The community has not provided any other guidance to remove "stale" items. —Bagumba (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We've also not had a lot of nominated blurbs that would be appropriate to post, either due to lack of article quality or lack of significance for front page posting. New blurbs displace older ones. Masem (t) 19:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba@Masem Well the Kasia image seems to have been removed now! Not sure what happened! Blurb is still up, but image has been changed to a pic of the Paralympic Opening ceremony. Good change! Alexysun (talk) 23:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN image is explained at WP:ITNPICT. If the image is not from the topmost blurb, and one knows a suitable image from a higher blurb, it can be noted at WP:ERRORS for replacement. —Bagumba (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba Well I know she wasn’t the top blurb for days, so it seems more like a lack of will to change it rather than no one realizing it was an “error” in conflict with “policy”. Alexysun (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well of course if there really wasn’t a picture for higher blurbs I guess she would have to stay.. Alexysun (talk) 07:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was the usual inertia which afflicts ITN due to its obstructive culture. To keep the section as fresh as the other main page sections, there have been recent suggestions such as Changing the picture daily (above) which could easily be done by using RD photos like Sid Eudy (pictured). There's plenty of support for these ideas but the same obstructionism which prevents frequent updates also prevents the process being improved. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 112 § Currently 2 options: RD or RD/blurb. How about a 3rd option: RD/photo but no blurb? was stalled on objective criteria on how to determine what images to rotate in. —Bagumba (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General elections on ITNR

ITNR currently lists:

The results of general elections in:
- All states on the list of sovereign states;
- European Union elections.
- Disputed states and dependent territories should be discussed at WP:ITN/C and judged on their own merits.

as recurring items. However, in practice, whether or not something falls under ITNR due to this clause is based on a case-by-case assesment, as "general election" has many different meanings. This is clearly a sub-optimal situation, as ITNR is meant for items where there is no question of notability. I think it would be much better to make a list explicitly stating which elections have previously been considered ITNR under the "general elections" clause. Then we could remove the "general elections" clause entirely, and replace it by that list. The list would be long, but we could just make a new page (such as WP:ITNR/Elections). What are other peoples thoughts on this? Gödel2200 (talk) 17:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't much matter because the key point about ITN/R is that the topics are supposed to be shoo-ins. The real issue is that it is instead used to suppress comment on controversial topics such as elections in microstates or fake elections in police states. Why can't we just discuss each case on its merits? Why do we have to be told how to vote? Andrew🐉(talk) 18:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in Barsalogho now numbering 400-500 according to Reuters sources

This might be worth updating, as it's double of the figure the front page currently gives. 2A02:8071:184:4E80:0:0:0:5084 (talk) 22:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]