Jump to content

Talk:TransMilenio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can someone define "bi-articulated"? I thought it was a bus with two sections and an accordian swingy-thing in the middle, which the TransMilenio buses certainly have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamk (talkcontribs) 19:53, 16 March 2004 (UTC)[reply]

It means articulated twice, in that a bi-articulated bus has three sections and two accordian swingy-thing. Bi-articulated buses are used in the city of Curitiba. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.158.236 (talkcontribs) 02:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms

[edit]

This section seems to be based on circumstantial and anecdotal grumbles, rather than objective data or evidence. I suggest that it be deleted if it cannot be improved and properly referenced. Cripipper 14:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, in short these are the main critics for the system, i have read them in El Tiempo. But I found a site with some of these critics, so I`m gonna add it as a source.--ometzit<col> 18:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--- agree with the term, bi-articulated sounds like two articulations, which mean a 3-section bus and not a 2-section as they really are. i saw on the news somewhere that transmilenio is going to use a longer bus, which could be bi articulated —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gcancelado (talkcontribs) 22:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Claim without reference

[edit]

Most users agree that TransMilenio is a vast improvement over Bogotá's previous public transit system, especially in comparison with the chaotic systems in place in cities like Lima, Peru. There are a number of criticisms based on the way the system works.[1] Lenny230 (talk) 22:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Lenny230[reply]

I have found a new source for (basically) this information. And the bulleted criticisms, anyway, I've removed as unsourced except for one's widely supported by the survey I used as the source. The rest of the protests/criticism could use sourcing. I do hate to get rid perfectly good first hand knowledge just because there is no source. Maybe if someone disagrees with what is said. Diderot's dreams (talk)

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on TransMilenio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – checked and working. Richard3120 (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish please!

[edit]

Do these sources fit to the story in chapter „New Fleet"? I personally do not understand Spanish, but spanish wikipedians might help and translate. We might find contradicting news:[1] [2]Waegend (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC) Waegend (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NY Times Dec 2023 source

[edit]

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/07/headway/bogota-bus-system-transmilenio.html Djflem (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]