Jump to content

Talk:Potential output

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

[edit]

Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A chart would be helpful comparing Real vs Potential GDP

[edit]

It would be very helpful if the page included or linked a chart showing

Log of real GDP vs log of potential GDP (or "Potential output" as the current WP article is disappointingly titled))

with which potential GDP is frequently and most helpfully contrasted.

This article should be renamed Potential GDP.

[edit]

This article should be renamed Potential GDP, rather than just redirected from "Potential GDP".

The "Real GDP" article should linked here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.142.40 (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]