Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brabble (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snow/Speedy delete as an apparently deliberate violation of the WP TOu and WP:COI, and of the basic policy NOT PROMOTIONAL. DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brabble[edit]

Previous AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article written by SPA Ralum23 reads like an advertorial and has all the hallmarks of a salaried or commissioned work created in deliberate anticipation of the product launch. The numerous routine reports used as sources do not afford notability to a start-up that hasn't even started up. In the words of guideline WP:SPAM: 'advertisements masquerading as articles' Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The previous deletion was for a hoax, 12 years ago. The page name is a coincidence and is completely unrelated. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per WP:NOT. Dysklyver 23:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It claims it's in beta. No coverage other than press releases so far. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete there is nothing notable about this company; nothing to learn from that goes toward our mission of providing readers with accepted knowledge. This is because there is a lack of independent sources with substantial of the company. This is just a directory entry with factoids to promote the company. Jytdog (talk) 00:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. And run a CU on the creator who is obviously not a new account and an undisclosed paid editor. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nominator. The article's current references makes the subject appear to be covered in reliable sources but is only mentioned in passing. Meatsgains (talk) 02:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note A history merge from Draft:Brabble was performed after this AfD started - the final presentation is unchanged. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete excluded by WP:NOTSPAM, as the nomination makes clear. Also not notable to boot. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after doing some probably misguided cleanup, it's apparent to me this is unsalvageable and at best a WP:TOOSOON. Agree that this has all the classic hallmarks of a paid job against ToS. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.