Talk:Catholic social teaching
Appearance
Catholic social teaching was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Quality of article
[edit]Why was the article delisted as a "good article"? The note above says there are suggestions here about how it could be improved, but these and all other comments appear to have been removed. Why? Deipnosophista (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Deipnosophista: The full reasons are set out at Talk:Catholic social teaching/GA1.
- The primary issues raised by the reassessing editor were the lack of independent sourcing—that is, sourcing that isn't directly from the Catholic church—as well as a few statements that were not verified by the sources. If one compares the version available at the time of the reassessment with the version now, I'd say these issues have been addressed to some extent.
- As it was in February 2010, the majority of the article's references took the form of pointers to encyclicals. The article still relies too heavily on primary sourcing—a general problem across religious articles. Specifically, now, it probably relies too heavily on the Catechism. Obviously, it has now been expanded to cover developments since Francis became Pope. The secondary sourcing has improved, although there's plenty of sources out there to improve it.
- Older comments on the talk page have been archived to Talk:Catholic social teaching/Archive 1 by an archiving bot. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your helpful reply to my question on the Catholic Social Teaching article. Deipnosophista (talk) 11:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Delisted good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Oxford spelling
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- High-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Mid-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles