Jump to content

Talk:Subh-i-Azal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Do not remove sources and then claim you are cleaning up the article

[edit]

Removing relevant sources from the bibliography and claiming you are cleaning up the article is vandalism. Stop it! 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:C0FD:47AF:3A54:1336 (talk) 01:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there are references that are not used in the article, they get removed. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 23:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And upon what basis is this determination made other than your own? Leave it alone because what you are doing is a form of intellectual vandalism. 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:D4E0:5622:579E:2FC4 (talk) 02:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources you are removing are also catalogued sources appearing on *WorldCat* as well as the catalogue of the *National Library of Australia*. So what you have determined as "unreliable" is your own bias, and has nothing do with with any objective determination or criteria to anything that Wikipedia is specifically saying. See for yourself:

https://search.worldcat.org/title/1452284554

https://search.worldcat.org/title/1452285135

https://search.worldcat.org/title/1452285121

And given that these citations are more recent than the others, by any objective academic (or even non-academic) criteria they not only require inclusion but override the older cited works, and so must be cited because they are about the topic of the entry.

2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:D4E0:5622:579E:2FC4 (talk) 02:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reference section is for sources being cited in the article. Four of the sources I removed were not in the article, and three of those were from Wahid Azal (real name Nima), who is an online troll, not a reliable source. The fifth thing I removed was a cite to Wahid Azal that was redundant to another reference. User:Qalandar303 in 2022-3 added the same citation repeatedly to this page ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) and was later banned indefinitely from editing due to general incivility and legal threats (Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive349). Now less than two years later we have an anonymous account trying to insist on inserting the same reference, using the same "Do not remove..." talk page headers ([6]).
Please stop disruptive editing. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 22:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your reasons are irrelevant, display bias, and are outside of the scope of valid reasons that Wikipedia claims for bibliographic citations. Furthermore, you nor the Haifan Bahai organization are proprietors of any entry on Wikipedia. This means you do not own any article or entry here. You have been reverted, and will continue to be so indefinitely. If you continue to misbehave, brow-beat and bully, rights are reserved to take furthermore action.

2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:9CF2:F974:5F1F:12FE (talk) 23:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]