Jump to content

Talk:Ranjit Singh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Resolve conflict please

[edit]

Need your involvement Admin Sahib Ranjit Singh article

[edit]

Reason: small level of vandalism.

  • RegentsPark, Ranjit singh Article has been conflicted by editor see user:Hind ji,he always edit jat caste related articles or I think he belongs to jat caste please see the log of user:Hind ji[[1]]So your involvement requested to resolve the conflict ,there are variety of resources available on the internet but recently University had his researched on criminal tribes shows Ranjit Singh belongs to sansi caste :Hind ji try to declared Ranjit Singh as jat ,I have added that link as reliable source or as reference but one of user:Hind ji has reverted my edit without informing me .I may also have been wrong ,kindly resolve our issues.hope for early reply Thank you.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/features/research-on-tribes-dubbed-criminal-by-british-397524 He trying to create influence of jat caste .

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2024

[edit]
Emailtolucky10 (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HISTORY THE CASTE OF MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH WAS SAID TO BE OF A SANSI SIKH AS PER THE OLD RECORDS FOUND IN LAHORE PAKISTAN WHICH NEEDS TO BE CHECKED AS THE AMRITSAR AIRPORT WAS NAMED AFTER HIM AS RAJASANSI AIRPORT HOWEVER HE IS ALLEGEDLY OF THE JAT SIKH FAMILY MAY PLEASE BE CHECKED WITH THE RECORDS FOUND IN THE LAHORE FORT PAKISTAN

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reg info in issue section

[edit]

Maharaja Kharak singh was born on 24th Feb, 1800 (Samvat 1857). Ref. Umdat-ut-twarikh Kanwar Rattan Singh was born on 1802. So request you to kindly edit the info section by adding kanwar Rattan singh followed by the rest as he was the second son.

I also appreciate your protection mode in this matter as few were inclined to deteriorate the family history.

Appreciate your kind understanding.

Thanks & Regards Kanwar Sandeep Singh Sukherchakia (Adv) Kanwar sandeep (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In section Early years

[edit]

Maharaja Ranjit singh was a Suryavanshi Rajpootra of Kashyap Gotra. The symbol of Surya can be seen in his dome.

Secondly in the section Early years it reads "Sandhawalia Jat" which is wrong because how can Maha Singh form a Sukherchakia Misl if he was a Sandhawalia Jat? The information conflicts here and also on village sukherchak which is 8 miles from the fort city Amritsar which was the jaddi pind settled by Budda Singh (Desi) where as the Sandhawalia pend is Raja Sansi where you will find the samadhas of Sandhawalia's ancestors only and not a single one from our family.

Dear Editor, I want to make many changes in this topic because this history is misleading as it's devoid of certain facts. Maharaja Ranjit Singh born on 13th Nov, 1780 in Badrukha and not in Gujranwala, because when Maha Singh received the news of his birth he was at a Muhim and Gujranwala was always vulnerable.

Appreciate your understanding!

You can contact me, so that i can provide you all the necessary information which requires a serious edit.

Thanks & Regards Kanwar Sandeep Singh Sukherchakia (Adv. SC) Kanwar sandeep (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel you disagreement is nothing but just am speculation to mislead the article transparency the source inclining he was undisputedly have connection with samdhawalia background but if you still have any misconceptions regarding his ancestry He was indeed a Jat which can be determined if you check his maternal ancestral household almost all of them were affiliated with Jat background, please seek some consolation from your near by doctor {{duck}} भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kanwar sandeep
Ok lets just we believe your assumption is hypothetically true however it still not make any different because you trying to achieve Suketchakia and Sandhawalia were quite equivalent as family as hole while sukeechakia is a broader twrm consolidate for misl on the other hand sandhawalia is correlated a nuclear family but still id doesn’t pose any effect on Ranjit singh Background for sure thanks alot 61.0.61.83 (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]