Talk:Europe Transparent
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-Inscrits or Greens/EFA?
[edit]The article says:
Europa Transparant (Transparent Europe) is a new Non-Inscrits party from the Netherlands in the European Parliament ... Van Buitenen and the number two on the list, Els de Groen who has written about corruption scandals in Eastern Europe, have joined the fraction Greens/European Free Alliance as independent members.
Now, I'm a bit fuzzy on the relationshp between European parties and EU parliament groupings, but surely the party can't be said to be NI if its members have joined the Green/EFA grouping, correct? My guess from reading this is that the party, which was brand new when elected in 2004, started off as an NI because of its new and unique political stance, and later joined the G/EFA grouping without formally joining the European parties. But that's just a guess. :) Still, this needs to be worked out -- there are currently links to this party from both the Non-Inscrits and European Greens - European Free Alliance pages, and this page doesn't clarify matters. --Jfruh 04:48, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I think you've got it. There was a lot of horse-trading at the start of the current session, particularly with all the new MEPs from the ten accession countries. It looks like Europa Transparant started off as Non-Inscrits and then decided to join the Greens/EFA group, but they are not members of the European Greens (a fully fledged party) or the European Free Alliance (a federation) — they just sit with the group in parliament. The European Parliament website has both of their MEPs down as being part of the Greens/EFA anyway [1] so I've removed the NI bit from the article. My guess is that because (according to the article) "because this goal is very time-consuming they won't participate in the normal system of debates, reports, meetings, etc" they have just chosen to go along with whatever the G/EFA say and whichever way they vote most of the time so as to avoid having to scrutinise everything independently, while they are busy rooting out 'opaqueness'. This is my guess anyway. — Trilobite (Talk) 06:27, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Defunct
[edit]This page should be added to the Defunct-parties-of-the-Netherlands group, I don't know how (a template tool?)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Europe Transparent page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Europe Transparent" page.
- Start-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Start-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class European Union articles
- Unknown-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles