Jump to content

Talk:Land value tax

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Former good article nomineeLand value tax was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 7, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Needs a deeper explanation

[edit]

The fundamental base of LVT is reclaiming commonly created wealth to use for common purposes. Nowhere does it say this. . 152.37.76.153 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite agree.
This is the strong argument in favour. Privatizing this publicly created value is evidently out of order. There are documented arguments stressing this. Guy Standing is one good source.
For the size of this common value I find this very instructive:
https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/chapter4-economic-evidence-base-2016.pdf Janosabel (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Objections should be included

[edit]

Establishment blockers hide behind silence

[edit]

Reopen Archived? Talk:Land value tax/Archive 1#Claimed disadvantages

Janosabel (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

price of rent

[edit]

the price of rent is determined by supply and demand not "what tenants are prepared to pay" whatever that means 112.209.203.48 (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]