Jump to content

Talk:Yes (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleYes (band) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2022Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 26, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that given a choice between Life and World, the answer was Yes?

The redirect Yes (band has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Yes (band until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is uncited text thoughout the article, including entire paragraphs.
  • At over 9,000 words, WP:TOOBIG states that information could possibly be spun out or summarised more effectively.
  • There are a lot of sources listed in the Further reading section. Can some of these be used as inline citations, or should be removed from the article?

Is anyone interested in addressing the above, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Z1720: Thanks for bringing this up. I agree that Further reading should be condensed (possibly something similar could be done with the "Band members" subsection). The length of the article did come up during the GAN iirc. What would be your suggested word count target? Best, Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Caleb Stanford: Generally, I try for under 9,000, but I also think that articles should be summarised as much as possible by using as few words as possible to describe ideas, avoiding adverbs, limiting block quotes and avoiding too much detail. I would rather that an editor read through and improve the entire article rather than stopping once the 9,000 word limit is reached. Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]