Talk:Cornel West

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cornel West article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 365 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Christianity: Baptist Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Baptist work group.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

What is the problem with mentioning his financial problems?

I´m alluding to the part I added that was sourced by Forbes Magazine on the 11th of Decemeber this year and was reverted. StrongALPHA (talk) 09:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For one, Forbes contributors generally have no editorial oversight whatsoever, and it's been agreed that an article they've contributed to should never be used for claims about living people, see WP:FORBESCON. Remsense留 19:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is public factual verified and well known Cornel West is broke, poor, has no savings, and owes a lot to his ex wives and children he neglected. He wrote about this himself in his memoir and has said so in interviews. 100.34.234.175 (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then it should be trivial to provide a reliable source to that effect. Remsense诉 22:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No personal life section?

I checked through the talk page archives and found that some editors noticed the lack of a personal life section back in 2007. 13 years later, in 2020, an editor replied agreeing that a personal life section should be in the article. 4 years later, I just happened to notice that no such section exists and I'm surprised that there seemingly has never been one, despite this being a normal part of many biography articles.

I think such a section ought to exist, but I'm curious if any editors have any ideas as to what should be in it. I think it would make sense to mention where he resides, any family members worth mentioning (e.g. spouse(s), children, sibling(s), etc), maybe more details about his religious views and how he practices his faith, and (only if quality sources report on it), potentially controversial information like financial struggles.

Any suggestions or objections?

Vanilla Wizard 💙 23:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content of articles is driven by the degree of coverage in reliable sources. Generally personal life is covered less for academics than for entertainers, such as Paris HIlton or Lindsay Lohan. TFD (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is public factual verified and well known Cornel West is broke, poor, has no savings, and owes a lot to his ex wives and children he neglected. He wrote about this himself in his memoir and has said so in interviews. 100.34.234.175 (talk) 21:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As "philosopher" and "theologian"

There is no basis of which I am aware for identifying him as a philosopher or theologian. He has made virtually no intellectual contributions to these domains. His academic publication record consists of 20 or fewer works. He has no Google Scholar profile. His highest Scopus H index is 4 with twelve documents published with Princeton and five with Harvard. The latest Harvard one is his 1993 book 'Race Matters,' whose publisher categorizes it under "social science." His most recent Princeton publication is the foreword to someone else's book. His well publicized run-in with former Harvard President Summers over 20 years ago entailed West's almost total lack of academic intellectual work. Publication of non-peer-reviewed tomes that he identifies as "philosophy" or "theology" is not evidence for self-professed expertise. Affiliation per se with such domains does not afford one this designation. Nor does merely meeting Wikipedia's standards of notability predicated on provocative media coverage sought by the Wikipedia subject. If there are substantive reasons for these labels, then please provide citations consistent with Wikipedia's guidelines for assigning this designation. CeilingFan2Sea (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he's published in more academic sources than aquinas ever did. plato didn't write anything at all. your standard for the labels is arbitrary. 814jjs (talk) 814jjs (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit source availability

What's going on with source editing? - Joaquin89uy (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Hip Hop 50

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rembrant the GOAT (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by KING162 (talk) 16:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why does the first line of this article describe him as "controversial"?

To my knowledge that is not common amongst public figures on Wikipedia, and I would be hard pressed to find any in politics like Cornel West who are not controversial. Why is he described this way? 195.194.50.6 (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve removed the descriptor. There was no consensus sought for this and it does not belong in the lead sentence. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 08:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to the end of the second paragraph in the lead. Is that a more appropriate place? Superb Owl (talk) 16:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but I still dunno if it’s really warranted. I’d assume there would be more sources than just two if he was this universally regarded as controversial. We do have a controversy section but it seems to be about his personal life, something entirely different from what the sources say he’s controversial for, and that to the best of my knowledge isn’t touched in in the article. (Also, as the first verb in the sentence is “is”, “been” does not make sense here. It’d either be “is” again or “has been described by XYZ as” with attribution to the sources and as to why he’s controversial at all, which imo is far better. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 16:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to move it to the controversies section and do more work to tease out exactly what those 2 RS and other RS are referring to before proposing a lead summary Superb Owl (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms around 2024 campaign - proposed re-add

Proposed draft to re-add to article - feel free to mark-up or edit there if easier or comment here Superb Owl (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism sections are bad style and the information in them should be placed in the relevant section of the article. For example, criticism of his candidacy as being a spoiler belongs in the section about his candidacy.

Also, mentioning criticism without saying who it came from or how widespread it is violates WP:WEASEL. As far as the reader knows, the criticism could have come from a conspiracy theory website. TFD (talk) 19:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]