Talk:Esperanto

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Esperanto article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24: 60 days

Esperanto was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 25, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 4, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
December 25, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
July 1, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
July 3, 2007	Good article reassessment	Listed
September 4, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
June 16, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 26, 2004, July 26, 2005, July 26, 2012, and July 26, 2014.
Current status: Delisted good article

Criticism of Esperanto was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 April 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Esperanto. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Constructed languages: Esperanto Top‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.
	This article is an Esperanto core topic.

Languages Top‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/29/8672371/learn-esperanto-language-duolingo-app-origin-history

Zagreb

The Zagreb method is an Esperanto teaching method that was developed in Zagreb, Yugoslavia (present-day capital city of Croatia),

I believe Zagreb was the capital of Croatia then too, and would prefer

... developed in Zagreb, capital of Croatia (then part of Yugoslavia),

or, even better, omit any direct mention of Croatia or Yugoslavia, whose relevance is not obvious. That's what links are for. —Tamfang (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KTP

Historically, much music has been written in the language such as Kaj Tiel Plu.

Kaj Tiel Plu ('and so forth', literally 'and thus more') appears to be the name of a performing group, not a work. Either way, the sentence could be clearer. —Tamfang (talk) 00:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, there exists eo:Kategorio:Esperantaj muzikaj grupoj. —Tamfang (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

When did Ayatollah Khomeini recommend Esperanto as a international language?

When was the Esperanto Koran published?

Is Esperanto still used in Iran, especially in Qom?

MountVic127 (talk) 04:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naskinto is gender neutral term for “parent”.

Naskinto is the correct term for parent; Zamenhof used it himself. the claim that “esperanto doesnt have a gender neutral term for parent” is not even correct. that claim should be removed.

»Oni nomas la donacon patrineco-pakaĵo, kaj ĝi evitigas multe da cerbumado kaj butikumado. Ĝi enhavas 54 utilaĵojn, kiel bebovestaĵojn, litaĵojn, zorgilojn por naskinto kaj naskito, kaj ankaŭ kondomojn. La kartona skatolo mem, granda 70 x 43 x 27 cm, estas uzebla kiel bebolito.« https://tekstaro.com/t?nomo=artikoloj-el-monato-2012-2018&uzistreketojn=0&tipo=&sekcio=monato-2016-011695&antauasekcio=1&postasekcio=1
»R: Jes, sed malmultaj. La ĉinoj estas seriozaj pri seksaj interrilatoj, kaj seksaj rilatoj antaŭ geedziĝo estas riproĉataj de la publika opinio. La Geedza Leĝo de Ĉinio difinas, ke eksteredzecaj infanoj estas protekta- taj. Ili povas esti vivtenataj de la naskintoj aŭ de aliuloj.« https://dlibra.kul.pl/Content/48571/55874_V-19034_El-Popola-Cinio.pdf
»Laŭ moderna prononco, „Awadi”. Aha-di signifas: „vojo al Aha“, (ĉar ĝi kuŝas mezvoje al la provinco Aha) sed la vorto volas diri nenion pri tio, ke ĝi ne „plaĉis“ al la naskintoj; tial la originala noto en la krampoj estas tute ne komprenebla; eble ĝi estas malĝusta aldonaĵo, farita de malmulteinformita manskribisto en frua tempo, kiu legis la vorton, „a-hadi“, kio tiam signifas „mia honto“.« https://www.vastalto.com/librejo/KroJap/KroJap1.html

2600:6C5D:4600:2D9F:0:6B55:DCD1:D655 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naskinto is a mother (in the context of a birth), not a parent: it means 'birthgiver'. Even there, naskinto and patrino are not synonyms: Your 'mother' is not necessarily your birthgiver, any more than your 'father' is necessarily your sperm-donor. — kwami (talk) 06:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]